Tolerance of December 16, 2020 PIC Vote: Lawyer and Anti-Corruption Activist at Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC)

📋 Instance Information

Date:
December 16, 2020
Event:
Institutional tolerance of Vadym Valko's participation in the unanimous PIC vote (15/15) adopting revised Indicators equating Crimea with Russia
Location:
Kyiv, Ukraine
Venue Type:
Official meeting
Severity:
HIGH
Verified:
✓ Yes
Verified Date:
April 26, 2026

🎯 Position at Time of Violation

Position: Lawyer and Anti-Corruption Activist at Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC)

💬 The Statement

"The PIC unanimously adopted revised Indicators that treat travel to, property in, or family connections with occupied Crimea as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation — formally equating sovereign Ukrainian territory with an aggressor state in official integrity assessments. "

Context: CrimeaWatch analysis of the December 16, 2020 PIC vote and its implications for employer organizations

📄 Full Details

Background#

Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC) employed Vadym Valko as Lawyer and Anti-Corruption Activist during their service on the Public Integrity Council (second composition, December 2018 – December 2020).

The Vote#

On December 16, 2020, the PIC unanimously (15/15) adopted revised Indicators of Integrity and Professional Ethics. These Indicators formally equate connections to occupied Crimea — including travel, property ownership, and family ties — with connections to the Russian Federation for purposes of judicial integrity assessment.

Vadym Valko was among the 15 members who cast votes in favor of this decision.

Institutional Tolerance#

Anti-Corruption Action Center (AntAC)’s continued employment and promotion of Vadym Valko during and after their PIC membership constitutes institutional tolerance of activities that contradict Ukraine’s constitutional framework regarding its territorial integrity.

The organization has not publicly addressed the contradiction between its institutional identity and Vadym Valko’s participation in the adoption of criteria that de facto treat Crimea as Russian territory.

By equating Crimea with Russia in official integrity assessments, the December 16, 2020 Indicators operate on the unstated premise that Crimea is under Russian jurisdiction — directly contradicting Ukraine’s Constitution (Articles 2, 73, 133–134), the Law on the Temporarily Occupied Territory (2014), and UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (2014).

🔎 Evidence