Negative Integrity Conclusion on Maksym Mykolaiovych Hloba: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

What Happened#

On March 30, 2026, the Public Integrity Council approved a negative integrity conclusion on Maksym Mykolaiovych Hloba (Глоба Максим Миколайович), a candidate for a position at Appellate court. The conclusion was adopted by 12 of 19 members.

The PIC cited Hloba’s multiple trips to the Russian Federation during the period from December 25, 2013, to June 13, 2014 — which encompasses the Russian occupation of Crimea — as unjustified travel without urgent necessity. By treating these trips as integrity violations, the PIC implicitly recognized Russian jurisdiction over occupied Crimea, since the candidate explained he crossed through Crimea and the PIC evaluated this as travel to ‘RF territory’ rather than Ukrainian territory under illegal occupation.

The Crimea-related element was cited as a direct basis for the negative conclusion.

The Crimea Connection#

During the period from 25.12.2013 to 13.06.2014, the Candidate repeatedly visited RF territory. The Public Integrity Council critically evaluates the provided explanations, as the Candidate’s stated motives for visiting RF territory do not indicate the presence of objective or urgent necessity for such trips and are of a domestic nature.

This quote demonstrates the PIC’’s implicit recognition of Russian jurisdiction over Crimea by treating the candidate’’s trips during the occupation period as visits to ‘‘RF territory’’ rather than Ukrainian territory under illegal occupation.

Context#

The Public Integrity Council was established in 2016 as part of post-2014 judicial reform in Ukraine. Its mandate was to assist in vetting judges and judicial candidates based on integrity and professional ethics. While formally an advisory body, its conclusions carried significant weight in qualification proceedings and could directly affect judicial careers.

Under Ukrainian law, Crimea is a temporarily occupied territory under the Law on Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime of the Temporarily Occupied Territory (2014). The Constitution of Ukraine affirms Crimea as an integral part of Ukraine whose status cannot be altered without an all-Ukrainian referendum.

By treating Crimea-related connections as integrity risks within a formal assessment framework, the PIC applies an operational logic that treats Crimea as Russian-administered territory — reproducing the same premise that was formally codified in the December 16, 2020 revised Indicators.

Voters#

Verification#

• Official PIC conclusion document dated March 30, 2026, available on the Council’s public website.
• Electronic voting record confirming the vote count and participating members.