Employment of PIC Member: Editor-in-Chief at Ukrainian Witness

🎯 Position at Time of Violation

Position: Editor-in-Chief at Ukrainian Witness

💬 The Statement

"The PIC systematically applies integrity criteria that treat connections to occupied Crimea — travel, property, family ties — as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation, effectively treating sovereign Ukrainian territory as foreign territory in official assessments. "

Context: CrimeaWatch analysis of the PIC's Crimea-recognition methodology and its implications for employer organizations

📄 Full Details

Background#

Ukrainian Witness employs Kateryna Lykhohliad as Editor-in-Chief. Kateryna Lykhohliad serves as a member of the Public Integrity Council (fourth composition).

The PIC’s Crimea-Recognition Methodology#

The Public Integrity Council applies integrity criteria that treat connections to occupied Crimea — including travel, property ownership, and family ties on the peninsula — as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation. This methodology operates on the unstated premise that Crimea is under Russian jurisdiction.

Institutional Tolerance#

Ukrainian Witness’s continued employment of Kateryna Lykhohliad during their PIC membership constitutes institutional tolerance of participation in a body whose methodology contradicts Ukraine’s constitutional framework regarding its territorial integrity.

The PIC’s treatment of Crimea as equivalent to Russia contradicts Ukraine’s Constitution (Articles 2, 73, 133–134), the Law on the Temporarily Occupied Territory (2014), and UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (2014). Ukrainian Witness has not publicly addressed this contradiction.