Andrii Kulibaba

Andrii Kulibaba

Staff member
Kyiv City Military Administration (КМВА)
HIGH Active ✓ Verified

⚠️ Violation Context

Recognition of Crimea as part of the Russian Federation violates fundamental principles of international law and Ukrainian sovereignty.

Andrii Kulibaba’s PIC Role#

Kulibaba served as a full member and co-coordinator of the second composition of the Public Integrity Council (December 17, 2018 – August 11, 2020), delegated by the Center for Civil Liberties (CCL). Together with Mykhailo Zhernakov, he co-led the Council throughout most of its two-year term.

As co-coordinator, Kulibaba occupied one of the two most structurally prominent positions in the second composition — co-leading the body that systematically applied integrity criteria treating post-2014 Crimea-related judicial conduct (visits, residence, family ties, property) as grounds for negative conclusions. This methodology operates on the operative premise that Crimea functions as a foreign (Russian) jurisdiction for Ukrainian institutional purposes.

He resigned from the PIC on August 11, 2020 — four months before the composition’s term expired on December 17, 2020. Accordingly, he is not among the 15 members who voted on December 16, 2020 to formally adopt the updated Indicators embedding Crimea-related criteria. The reason for his early departure is not documented in publicly available sources.

His individual institutional responsibility is therefore distinguished from members who served the full term: he co-led the Council during the substantial majority of its active assessment work, but did not participate in the formal adoption of the consolidated Indicators.


International and Ukrainian Law Violations:#

  • UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (March 27, 2014) – Affirms Ukraine’s territorial integrity and calls upon all states not to recognize any alteration in Crimea’s status.
  • Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances (1994) – Commits signatories to respect Ukraine’s borders and sovereignty.
  • UN Charter Principles (Articles 2(1) and 2(4)) – Prohibit acquisition of territory by force.
  • Constitution of Ukraine, Article 2 — Territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable; Crimea is defined as an integral part of Ukraine.
  • Criminal Code of Ukraine, Article 110 — Criminalizes actions aimed at changing Ukraine’s territorial borders in violation of the Constitution.
13
Documented Instances
2019 - 2025
Time Period
↓ View documented instances

👤 Biography & Current Position

Andrii Kulibaba#

Ukrainian Lawyer, Civic Activist, Co-Coordinator of the Public Integrity Council Second Composition, Military Serviceman and Veteran

Andrii Kulibaba (Кулібаба Андрій Юрійович) is a Ukrainian lawyer and civic activist who served as a full member and co-coordinator of the second composition of the Public Integrity Council (PIC / ГРД) from December 17, 2018 to August 11, 2020, delegated by the Center for Civil Liberties (CCL). Together with Mykhailo Zhernakov, he co-led the Council throughout the majority of its operative term.

He is one of the most professionally multifaceted figures in this site’s documentation series: a lawyer with experience across civil society, commercial practice, and municipal governance; co-coordinator of the second PIC composition; founder of the civic organization “МІНЗМІН”; Kyiv City Council candidate; doctoral student; subsequently a soldier in Ukraine’s war against Russian aggression; and now a member of the Kyiv City Military Administration. His delegating organization, CCL, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022.

He is not among the 15 members who voted on December 16, 2020 — having resigned four months before that date.


Biography and Career#

Kulibaba holds legal education from three institutions: Kyiv-Mohyla Academy (NaUKMA), the Yaroslav Mudry National Law University in Kharkiv, and the Open University of Reforms. During his PIC tenure he was also enrolled as a PhD candidate at Sumy State University.

His professional background spans civil society (CCL), commercial legal practice (MORIS law firm), and public governance (Kyiv City Council). In August 2019 — midway through his PIC term — he co-founded and became head of ГО “МІНЗМІН,” a new civic organization registered in Kyiv.

Following the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022, he volunteered for military service and served in the “Chornyi Lis” unit — the 15th Artillery Reconnaissance Brigade, described as the only Ukrainian armed forces unit specifically tasked with artillery reconnaissance. After completing his combat service, he joined the Kyiv City Military Administration in 2025, working on issues related to military servicemembers, veterans, and urban development.


Role in the Public Integrity Council (December 2018 – August 2020)#

Co-Coordinator of the Second Composition#

Kulibaba was elected co-coordinator of the second composition alongside Zhernakov — making the two of them jointly responsible for the Council’s organizational leadership throughout its term. This was the most structurally senior role in the PIC, involving coordination of assessment procedures, public communications, and internal decision-making.

During the active assessment period (early 2019 through mid-2020), the PIC applied integrity criteria that treated post-2014 Crimea-related judicial conduct as grounds for negative conclusions. As co-coordinator, Kulibaba’s institutional role was not merely to vote on individual cases but to co-lead the body whose overall methodology embedded this approach.

Early Resignation#

Kulibaba resigned from the second composition on August 11, 2020 — four months before the composition’s scheduled end on December 17, 2020, and four months before the December 16, 2020 vote formally adopting the Crimea-related Indicators. The reasons for his early departure are not documented in publicly available sources.

His resignation preceded the composition’s most symbolically significant institutional act. This distinguishes his individual documented responsibility from members who participated in the December 16, 2020 named vote — while his co-coordinator role during the preceding 20 months placed him at the center of the PIC’s substantive application of Crimea-related criteria throughout that period.

The CCL Connection#

Kulibaba was delegated by the Center for Civil Liberties — an organization whose mission centers on human rights protection and documentation of Russian aggression. CCL was founded by Oleksandra Matviichuk and received the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022 for its documentation of Russian war crimes in Ukraine.

This institutional connection does not resolve the analytical tension inherent in the PIC’s Crimea-related methodology — the same tension documented in detail in Denys Savchenko’s profile (KrymSOS). Both CCL and KrymSOS are organizations premised on Russian occupation of Ukrainian territory being illegal and harmful; both delegated representatives to a council that applied criteria treating that occupation as an operative institutional premise. The CCL’s post-2022 Nobel recognition does not retroactively alter the institutional character of the PIC methodology in 2018–2020.


Third PIC Composition (2023–present)#

Kulibaba was elected to the third PIC composition in August 2023 — this time delegated through the DEJURE Foundation (not CCL), and again as coordinator. His transition to DEJURE affiliation by 2023 reflects a broader trajectory visible in this documentation series: the consolidation of DEJURE’s influence across successive PIC compositions, which had begun with Zhernakov’s leadership of the second composition.

His active participation in the third composition has been substantially limited by his concurrent military service — the official GRD page describes him as a current serviceman. Following his discharge and transition to the Kyiv City Military Administration, the extent of his resumed PIC engagement is not fully documented in public sources.


Summary#

Andrii Kulibaba’s profile is distinctive in this documentation series for several reasons: he occupied the highest procedural position in the second composition (co-coordinator) while serving for 20 of its 24 months; he was delegated by an organization (CCL) that went on to receive the Nobel Peace Prize for its anti-occupation human rights work; and he subsequently served in Ukraine’s military and civic administration. His individual institutional record in relation to the Crimea-related methodology is substantial by virtue of his co-leadership role, even though he departed before the December 16, 2020 vote and was not among its 15 named participants.

ℹ️ What Else We Know

Professional Activities#

  • Lawyer with experience at the Kyiv City Council, the Center for Civil Liberties (CCL), and the MORIS law firm.
  • Founder and Head of the Board of ГО “МІНЗМІН” (registered August 28, 2019 — during his second-composition PIC tenure), a civic organization based in Kyiv.
  • PhD candidate at Sumy State University (during PIC tenure).
  • Political activity: ran for the Kyiv City Council (9th convocation) from the “Holos” party.
  • Military service: served in the “Chornyi Lis” unit (15th Artillery Reconnaissance Brigade, Armed Forces of Ukraine) following the full-scale Russian invasion in February 2022.
  • Post-service: joined the Kyiv City Military Administration (КМВА) in 2025, working on military, veteran, and city development issues.

Third PIC Composition (2023–active)#

Kulibaba was elected to the third composition of the PIC (August 2023–), this time delegated through DEJURE Foundation rather than CCL, and again in the role of coordinator. However, his active participation in the third composition has been limited by his concurrent military service — the official third-composition page notes he is a current military serviceman.

Center for Civil Liberties — Nobel Context#

The Center for Civil Liberties, which delegated Kulibaba to the second PIC composition, was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2022 together with Ales Bialiatski (Belarus) and Memorial (Russia) — recognition of its human rights documentation work, particularly regarding Russian war crimes in Ukraine. CCL was co-founded by Oleksandra Matviichuk.

This context does not alter the analytical assessment of the PIC’s Crimea-related methodology but provides important institutional background: the organization that sent Kulibaba to the Council has been internationally recognized for its role in documenting Russian aggression.

📅 Career Timeline

2014 - 2018
Lawyer
Center for Civil Liberties (CCL) / Kyiv City Council / MORIS Law Firm — Kyiv, Ukraine
2018-12-17 - 2020-08-11
Member and Co-Coordinator, Second Composition
Public Integrity Council (PIC / ГРД), delegated by Center for Civil Liberties — Kyiv, Ukraine
2019-08-28 - present
Founder and Head of the Board
ГО 'МІНЗМІН' — Kyiv, Ukraine
2020
Candidate for Kyiv City Council
'Holos' Party — Kyiv, Ukraine
2022 - 2025
Military serviceman
'Chornyi Lis' unit (15th Artillery Reconnaissance Brigade), Armed Forces of Ukraine
2023 - present
Member and Coordinator, Third Composition
Public Integrity Council (PIC / ГРД), delegated by DEJURE Foundation — Kyiv, Ukraine (participation limited by military service)
2025 - present
Staff member
Kyiv City Military Administration (КМВА) — Kyiv, Ukraine

📋 Documented Instances

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Bilonozhenко Maryna Anatoliivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 May 5, 2025 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC flagged husband's 10% land ownership in occupied Crimea as integrity concern requiring explanation
"From the annual declarations submitted by the candidate of a person authorized to perform state or local government functions, it appears that the candidate's husband, from 12.06.2013, owns 10% of a land plot located in temporarily occupied Crimea. "
LOW ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Litvinov Serhii Volodymyrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 April 1, 2025 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited judge's family trips to occupied Crimea in 2018-2020 as integrity violation for visiting occupied territory without urgent need
"repeated trips by the judge personally and his family, presumably for vacation purposes, to occupied Crimea in 2018-2020 violate the integrity criterion, according to which a judge cannot visit temporarily occupied territories without urgent need after the start of armed aggression, as this exposes his professional activity and state interests to risk "
HIGH ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Makarenko Volodymyr Viacheslavovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 November 17, 2024 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited grandmother's property sales in occupied Simferopol as basis for integrity concerns about wealth sources
"On 12.06.2014 the judge's grandmother sold an apartment with total area of 46.5 sq.m in Simferopol for 2,000,000 Russian rubles or approximately 683,400 hryvnias at the official ruble to hryvnia exchange rate from NBU. Also on 30.05.2014 the judge's grandmother sold a land plot with area of 0.0497 ha, located in Simferopol district, for presumably 750,000 Russian rubles (poor copy quality) or approximately 254,925 hryvnias at the official ruble to hryvnia exchange rate from NBU. "
HIGH ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Remezok Anastasiia Yuriivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 August 21, 2024 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC flagged post-occupation trip to Crimea with son as judicial independence risk equivalent to visiting aggressor state territory.
"In August 2014, the judge together with her son visited the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The PIC believes that despite the absence of direct prohibition on visiting the Russian Federation between 2014 and 2021, such trips without urgent necessity, first, created risks to the judge's independence and exposed her to the risk of coming under the influence of the aggressor state's intelligence services. "
MEDIUM ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Dziuba Oleh Anatoliiovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 June 8, 2024 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited wife's business registration in occupied Sevastopol and Russian documentation as collaboration evidence.
"Using information from business aggregators, it was established that a person named "Dziuba Svetlana Vladimirovna" registered as an individual entrepreneur in Sevastopol on August 16, 2016, i.e., after the occupation of the Crimean Peninsula by Russian forces, with the type of activity "production of other outerwear". According to the data, Dziuba S.V. in 2014 (not earlier than July 2014) obtained a Russian passport and an individual personal account insurance number (in Russian - SNILS), which is valid. "
HIGH ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Hurenko Maksym Oleksandrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 October 5, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC flagged post-occupation travel to aggressor state territory as integrity concern requiring explanation.
"According to information from the judicial file, in May 2014 after the armed aggression of the Russian Federation, the judge visited the territory of the aggressor state. The urgency of the purpose of such a visit and the judge's awareness of the risks of such a journey for judicial independence require his explanations. "
LOW ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Judicial Candidate Kukoba: Crimea Property Evaluated Under Russian Jurisdiction Framework

📅 July 24, 2019 | 📍 Approval of negative integrity conclusion on judicial candidate Kukoba Oleksandr Oleksandrovych, citing undisclosed ownership of a land plot in occupied Crimea (Katsiveli, Yalta)
"Point 2 of the conclusion states: > According to the data from the declaration of a person authorized to perform state or local self-government functions for 2015, the judge owns a land plot in the locality of Katsiveli (Yalta) with an area of 390 sq.m. from 12.11.2013. However, he did not declare this land plot in his declaration of property, income, expenditures and financial obligations for 2013. [...] Technical problems in the operation of the registry occurred after the annexation of Crimea [...] "
MEDIUM ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Inna Mykhailivna Otrosh: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 July 3, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited unverified reports of judge's mother moving to Yalta after annexation and judge visiting Crimea in summer 2014 as integrity concerns requiring explanation.
"Vice-president of the Association of Lawyers of Ukraine Oleksiy Reznikov wrote on social media that there is information that Judge Otrosh's mother moved to Yalta after the annexation of Crimea and got employed in an illegitimate court. The judge visited Crimea in summer 2014. The Public Integrity Council could not verify this information, and therefore it requires explanation from the judge. "
LOW ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Viktor Mykhaylovych Poprevych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 May 17, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited undisclosed apartment in occupied Parteniti, Crimea as basis for negative integrity finding.
"In declarations for 2014, 2015, 2016, the judge did not declare his wife's ownership of an apartment measuring 51.5 sq.m in Parteniti (Alushta, Autonomous Republic of Crimea) worth 466,500 hryvnias at the time of acquisition in 2012. The judge indicated this apartment only in the 2013 declaration, in the amended 2015 declaration (submitted in 2017), and in declarations for 2017, 2018. "
HIGH ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Yesaulenko Maryna Volodymyrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 May 12, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC flagged judge's property ownership in occupied Crimea and systematic family visits as integrity concerns requiring explanation.
"the judge visited the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine three times in 2014, 2016 and 2017 for 6, 31 and 49 days respectively. In addition, the judge's minor children, her father, mother and mother-in-law repeatedly visited the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine for extended periods, and her sister probably lived in this territory in 2016-2018. The Public Integrity Council takes into account the fact that the judge and her relatives have property in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine, but the systematic visits to this territory by the judge and her relatives require additional explanations from the judge regarding the urgency of the needs for such trips. "
MEDIUM ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Liudmyla Petrivna Shestakovska: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 April 23, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited judge's extensive Crimea property, post-occupation trips, and obtaining Russian taxpayer ID as integrity violations.
"Also, according to data from the "Federal Tax Service" of the Russian Federation, the judge obtained an individual taxpayer number of the Russian Federation. For this purpose, she applied to the so-called "Interdistrict Inspection of the Federal Tax Service of Russia No. 2 for the Republic of Crimea" with an application for registration with the tax authorities of the Russian occupation administration on the territory of Crimea. Thus, by obtaining an individual taxpayer number of the Russian Federation, the judge actually recognized the jurisdiction of the occupation authorities on the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. "
HIGH ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Oleksii Oleksandrovych Yevsikov: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 January 21, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's mother-in-law representing persons who aided Crimea annexation as integrity violation
"From 12.02.2010 to 12.07.2010 she had power of attorney to represent the interests of Vadym Kolesnichenko (deputy head of the Party of Regions faction in the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, from 2014 - fled to Russia, where he obtained Russian citizenship and became a member of the 'Rodina' party, aided Russia's annexation of Crimea). These connections under the informal rules that operated during Viktor Yanukovych's presidency also obviously provided the Candidate with unfair advantages. "
MEDIUM ✓ Verified Official meeting

Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kartere Valerii Ivanovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

📅 January 18, 2019 | 📍 Andriy Kulibaba voted in favor: PIC flagged multiple trips to Russia in 2015-2016 as general security concern.
"The candidate in 2015-2016 together with related persons repeatedly (6 cases) crossed the border with the Russian Federation. The purpose of the trips is unknown. The candidate as a former military officer and judge should have understood the danger and risks threatening him and his family as a civil servant-judge. "
LOW ✓ Verified Official meeting