×
![]()
Mariia Horban
Journalist
NGL.media
HIGH
Active
✓ Verified
⚠️ Violation Context
Recognition of Crimea as part of the Russian Federation violates fundamental principles of international law and Ukrainian sovereignty.
Ukrainian Law Violations:#
- Constitution of Ukraine, Article 2 — Territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.
- Constitution of Ukraine, Articles 73, 133–134 — Crimea is defined as an integral part of Ukraine.
- Law of Ukraine “On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime on the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine” — Establishes that Crimea remains Ukrainian territory under temporary occupation.
- Criminal Code of Ukraine, Article 110 — Criminalizes actions aimed at changing Ukraine’s territorial borders.
22
Documented Instances
2025 - 2026
Time Period
↓ View documented instances
👤 Biography & Current Position
Mariia Horban#
Member of the Public Integrity Council of Ukraine (fourth composition)
Mariia Horban (Горбань Марія Василівна) served as a member of the Public Integrity Council of Ukraine (fourth composition, August 15, 2025 – present), representing Centre for Economic Strategy.
Why This Profile Exists#
The Public Integrity Council of Ukraine — the institution in which Mariia Horban served — systematically applied integrity criteria that treated connections to occupied Crimea as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation. This methodology rests on an unstated but consistent institutional premise: Crimea is under Russian jurisdiction.
Every PIC conclusion that cited a judge’s Crimea property, post-2014 travel to Crimea, or family ties on the peninsula as an integrity risk was, in effect, treating Crimea as a foreign (Russian) territory requiring justification before Ukrainian authorities — not as sovereign Ukrainian territory where Ukrainian citizens have every constitutional right to live, travel, and own property.
This directly contradicts:
- Ukraine’s Constitution, Articles 2, 73, 133–134 — Crimea is an integral part of Ukraine; its status can only be altered by an all-Ukrainian referendum
- The Law on the Temporarily Occupied Territory (2014) — explicitly maintains Ukrainian sovereignty over Crimea
- UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (2014) — affirms Ukraine’s territorial integrity and calls upon all states not to recognize any alteration of Crimea’s status
Mariia Horban, as a member of the PIC, participated in this institutional pattern of implicit recognition of Russian jurisdiction over Crimea.
International Law Violations#
- UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (March 27, 2014) — Affirms Ukraine’s territorial integrity and calls upon all states not to recognize any alteration in Crimea’s status.
- Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances (1994) — Commits signatories to respect Ukraine’s borders and sovereignty.
- UN Charter Principles (Article 2(1) and 2(4)) — Prohibit acquisition of territory by force; establish sovereign equality of states.
Ukrainian Law Violations#
- Constitution of Ukraine, Article 2 — Territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.
- Constitution of Ukraine, Articles 73, 133–134 — Any change to Ukraine’s territory requires an all-Ukrainian referendum; Crimea is defined as an integral part of Ukraine.
- Criminal Code of Ukraine, Article 110 — Criminalizes actions aimed at changing Ukraine’s territorial borders in violation of the Constitution.
Role in the PIC’s Crimea-Recognition Pattern#
Horban serves in the fourth composition of the Public Integrity Council, elected in August 2025 and officially assuming powers on August 15, 2025. As a PIC member, she participates in evaluating judges’ integrity based on indicators that treat connections to Crimea as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation, operationally recognizing Russian jurisdiction over Ukrainian territory. This institutional pattern violates Ukraine’s Constitution and the Law on Temporarily Occupied Territory.
Education and Career#
Mariia Horban is an investigative journalist from Lviv, Ukraine, working for NGL.media and Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty. She began her journalism career in 2017 and was a finalist for the professional journalism competition ‘Honor of the Profession 2020.’ She has co-authored international investigations with the Organized Crime and Corruption Reporting Project. As a member of the fourth composition of Ukraine’s Public Integrity Council, her participation in PIC conclusions that treat Crimea-related connections as integrity risks constitutes an implicit institutional recognition of Russian jurisdiction over Crimea, contradicting Ukraine’s constitutional order.
Controversies and Criticism#
Participation in Crimea-recognition methodology. As a member of the Public Integrity Council, Mariia Horban participated in the application of integrity assessment methodology that implicitly treats Crimea as operating under Russian jurisdiction. Every PIC conclusion that penalized judges for Crimea-related connections — property, travel, family ties — reproduces this premise in an official state-adjacent procedure.
Constitutional contradiction. The methodology applied by the PIC in which Mariia Horban served operates on a factual premise — that Crimea is under Russian administrative control — that Ukraine’s legal system requires treating as an illegal occupation rather than an established institutional reality.
Summary#
Mariia Horban’s membership in the Public Integrity Council’s fourth composition (August 15, 2025 – present) placed them inside the body responsible for applying integrity indicators that penalize judges and candidates for post-2014 connections to Crimea, on the operating premise that such connections carry the same weight as connections to the Russian Federation itself.
Across 22 documented PIC conclusions — from October 16, 2025 to September 30, 2026 — Mariia Horban has been named in connection with Crimea-related integrity concerns, including the earliest, on Yatsun Oleksandr Serhiiovych, and the most recent, on Podzirov Andrii Olehovych: PIC Treats 13-Day Crimea Trip for Son's Dance Festival as Integrity Violation Requiring 'Urgent Necessity' Justification. The full set is catalogued below, each entry linked to its underlying document and vote record.
ℹ️ What Else We Know
Professional Activities#
- Finalist of professional journalism competition ‘Honor of the Profession 2020’
- Co-authored international investigations on migrant trafficking and Bitcoin fraud with OCCRP
- Graduated from Ukrainian Catholic University School of Journalism and Ivan Franko National University
- Created documentary ‘Welcome to Ireland’ about Ukrainian refugees
- Member of fourth composition of Public Integrity Council representing media sector
📅 Career Timeline
2025 - present
Member of Public Integrity Council (4th composition)
Public Integrity Council — Kyiv, Ukraine
Public Integrity Council — Kyiv, Ukraine
2023 - present
Journalist
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty — Ukraine
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty — Ukraine
2021 - present
Investigative Journalist
NGL.media — Ukraine
NGL.media — Ukraine
2020 - 2023
Investigative Journalist
Slidstvo.Info — Ukraine
Slidstvo.Info — Ukraine
2019 - 2021
Journalist
Suspilne Novyny — Ukraine
Suspilne Novyny — Ukraine
2017 - 2019
Journalist
24 Kanal — Ukraine
24 Kanal — Ukraine
2017
Journalist
Lvivska Poshta Media — Lviv, Ukraine
Lvivska Poshta Media — Lviv, Ukraine
🖼️ Photo & Document Gallery
Mariia Horban
×
![]()
📋 Documented Instances
Podzirov Andrii Olehovych: PIC Treats 13-Day Crimea Trip for Son's Dance Festival as Integrity Violation Requiring 'Urgent Necessity' Justification
📅 September 30, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC adopted negative integrity conclusion on judge Podzirov citing visits to temporarily occupied territories without urgent necessity (including a 13-day June–July 2014 Crimea trip) and concerns about free use of an apartment.
"The candidate together with his family visited the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea more than four months after the start of the temporary occupation by the Russian Federation. At the same time, according to sub-paragraph 1.5 of paragraph 1 of the Indicators... trips to the Russian Federation, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or other temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine out of urgent necessity to close relatives or to resolve property matters do not in themselves indicate a violation of the relevant indicator. In this case, the candidate explained the trip to the temporarily occupied Crimea by the need to ensure his son's participation in a dance festival. That is, the stated purpose of the trip was not related to the need to visit close relatives, or to resolve property matters.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Antonov's Father and Brother Used Crimea Checkpoint in August 2019: PIC Treats Administrative-Boundary Crossing as Integrity Risk
📅 September 1, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited Antonov's father and brother crossing the Kherson–Crimea administrative boundary checkpoint in August 2019 as an integrity risk.
"In 2019, the candidate's father crossed the border through the checkpoint — a former entry-exit control point on the administrative boundary between Kherson Oblast and the temporarily occupied Crimea. The candidate's father departed on 2 August and returned on 21 August 2019. [...] The candidate's brother departed on 2 August 2019 through the checkpoint — a former entry-exit control point on the administrative boundary between Kherson Oblast and the temporarily occupied Crimea. [...] The totality of the cited data — regular trips by the candidate's close relatives to the Russian Federation and temporarily occupied Crimea — creates a justified need to obtain exhaustive explanations from the candidate.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Yushkov Mykhailo Mykhailovych: Repeated Trips to Occupied Crimea (2018–2020) and Mother-in-Law's Russian Passport Cited as Integrity Grounds
📅 August 31, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC approved a negative integrity conclusion on appellate court candidate Yushkov, citing his 2018–2020 trips to occupied Crimea and his mother-in-law's Russian passport.
"The candidate for the position of judge visited the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent necessity — that is, in the absence of critical and/or urgent, vitally necessary circumstances that cannot be resolved in any other way than by personal presence in those territories — despite the threat to his own security, that of his close persons, and to Ukraine's national security. [...] According to information obtained from open sources, including data arrays containing information from Russian registries, it has been established that the candidate's mother-in-law holds a passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation (series, number, issued by the UFMS in Kaliningrad Oblast of the RF in 2014). This information is important in the context of evaluating the candidate, also taking into account the facts of his repeated visits to the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine and the likely ties of his mother-in-law to the aggressor state.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Lapchenko Oksana Mykolaivna: PIC Issues Negative Integrity Conclusion Citing Conflict of Interest and Unexplained Asset Origins; Husband's Crimea Visits and Occupied-Territory Ties Noted as Additional Concerns
📅 July 29, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC adopted a negative integrity conclusion based on conflict-of-interest findings and unexplained asset origins; the husband's two trips to occupied Crimea and family-owned property there were recorded as additional concerns requiring explanation.
"The candidate's husband Lapchenko P.P. twice visited the temporarily occupied Crimea during the periods 12.08.2018–21.08.2018 and 16.08.2021–26.08.2021. [...] My husband's mother is the owner of a residential house located at: Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Chornomorskyi district, village Medvedeve [...] The cited information regarding systematic trips by close relatives and the candidate's husband himself to the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, as well as information about their use of passports of the russian federation and documents issued by the illegal occupying bodies [...] raises reasonable doubts in an outside observer regarding the existence and nature of the connections of the candidate's husband's close relatives with the aggressor state.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Fomin Pavlo Viktorovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 June 9, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's and his mother's trips to occupied Crimea in 2018–2019 as creating Russian intelligence recruitment risk.
"The candidate and members of his family visited the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea in 2018 and 2019. […] Having weighed and assessed all the facts and circumstances, the Public Integrity Council considers that, despite the absence of a direct prohibition on visits during the period between 2014 and 2021, such trips without urgent necessity, firstly, created risks to the candidate's independence and exposed him to the risk of falling under the influence of the aggressor state's special services, and secondly, demonstrated a dismissive attitude on the part of the candidate's family toward the civic consensus on publicly condemning Russia's aggressive actions and observing the unspoken principle of refraining from travel to the territory of the aggressor state.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Gida Olga Serhiivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 May 31, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited judge's September 2017 trip to Crimea with minor child and partner's property in occupied territory as integrity violations
"The judge did not display civic consciousness and patriotism, and committed acts that indicate support for aggressive actions of other states against Ukraine. The judge visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need, i.e., in the absence of critical and/or urgent vital circumstances
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shalahinova Anastasiia Volodymyrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 May 27, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited systematic trips to occupied Crimea and appeals to occupying courts as primary grounds for negative integrity finding
"The candidate visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need... despite threats to her own security, close persons and national security of Ukraine and appealed to judicial institutions of the occupying authority... The candidate made at least 6 entries to temporarily occupied territory, namely: 19.07.2014 - Exit 605 - 02.09.2014 - Entry 604
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Solovyov Oleg Leonidovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 April 14, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited repeated family trips to occupied Crimea from 2014-2018 as primary basis for negative integrity conclusion
"The candidate and his family members visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need, i.e., in the absence of critical and/or urgent life-essential circumstances. At the same time, such trips could not but be accompanied by contacts with representatives of the RF occupation forces, in particular RF border guards and customs officers. It is not excluded that also with representatives of the RF FSB. In addition, during such trips it was very difficult to avoid payment of money by the candidate and members of his family to the occupation budget.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Korytska Viktoriia Oleksandrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 April 14, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited judge's two post-occupation trips to Crimea and interactions with Russian border guards as primary basis for negative integrity conclusion
"undoubtedly when crossing the administrative border of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the judge communicated with Russian 'border guards' and 'customs officers', followed their orders and demands, provided documents for verification confirming her identity and right of entry to Crimea, as well as her belongings for customs inspection and processing
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Radchenko Vitalii Yevhenovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 30, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC flagged family ties to occupied Crimea including medical treatment in Alushta and Russian passport acquisition as integrity concerns.
"The candidate's mother left through the Kalanchak checkpoint - there is no information about her return. The candidate's sister left through the Chonhar checkpoint (temporary crossing point through Ukraine's administrative border with Crimea annexed by Russia), and returned through the Kalanchak checkpoint. According to available information, a woman with the same name as the candidate's sister received a Russian passport. The candidate's wife's mother underwent medical examination in occupied Alushta.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Maksym Mykolaiovych Hloba: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 30, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited Hloba's multiple trips to Russian Federation during 2013-2014 period as unjustified travel violating integrity standards
"During the period from 25.12.2013 to 13.06.2014, the Candidate repeatedly visited RF territory. The Public Integrity Council critically evaluates the provided explanations, as the Candidate's stated motives for visiting RF territory do not indicate the presence of objective or urgent necessity for such trips and are of a domestic nature.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shofarenko Yurii Fedorovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 26, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited undisclosed apartment sale in occupied Simferopol as integrity violation
"The candidate in his asset declaration for 2015 declared income of 2,304,000 UAH received from the disposal of real estate located in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The sale of real estate located in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea after the beginning of its occupation, in the absence of information about applicable legislation and procedure for formalizing such a transaction, may indicate a risk of carrying out relevant actions within the legal framework of the occupying state or with the participation of persons connected to the occupation authorities.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Zinchenko Oleksii Volodymyrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 22, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's August-September 2014 trips to occupied Crimea and Russia as primary grounds for negative integrity finding.
"Thus, in August-September 2014 — during the active phase of the Russian Federation's armed aggression against Ukraine, including the tragic events near Ilovaisk and the beginning of the occupation of parts of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the Candidate made at least three trips: two directly to the territory of the Russian Federation (Belgorod Oblast) and one to the temporarily occupied territory of the AR of Crimea.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Tetiana Dmytrivna Shevyrina: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 16, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited family relatives in occupied Crimea and multiple post-occupation family trips to peninsula as primary integrity violation
"The candidate and members of her family visited the territory of the aggressor state, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need... The candidate and her family have relatives in the temporarily occupied territory (AR Crimea) and recorded multiple trips by family members (after occupation)... the candidate's father visited temporarily occupied RF territories (AR Crimea) 11.04.2017–23.04.2017 and 01.07.2017–10.09.2017... the candidate's father-in-law made 8 more trips to RF territory and 2 trips to temporarily occupied Crimea
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Samoilenko Olena Anatoliivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 January 31, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's parents residing in occupied Donetsk and family travel patterns as primary integrity risks.
"The candidate's close relatives permanently reside under occupation from the very beginning in 2014 of the Russian Federation's military aggression against Ukraine to the present time. In the conditions of ongoing armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, the "urgency of need" to reside in temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine in each specific case must be evaluated considering the predicted risks and threats primarily to the life and health of the person (judge/candidate) and their close relatives, as well as to state security and national interests of Ukraine in case of detention of such person, their recruitment, etc.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Medvediev Kostiantyn Viktorovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 January 31, 2026
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's loan guarantee based on future Crimean property inheritance as integrity risk due to occupation-related legal uncertainties.
"Thus, the Candidate effectively admitted that the source for repaying the multi-million loan in the future should be property that was not inherited by him at the time of receiving the funds, was not in his ownership, and regarding which there are significant legal and factual uncertainties related to the temporary occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shabratskyy Hryhoriy Oleksiyovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 December 31, 2025
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited post-occupation trips to Luhansk via Russia and family ties on occupied territory as integrity risks from Russian intelligence services.
"The candidate and members of his family visited the territory of the aggressor state, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need, i.e. in the absence of critical and/or urgent vital circumstances... According to the integrity declaration for 2022 submitted with the competition documents, the candidate and his wife repeatedly visited temporarily occupied Luhansk in 2015 and 2016 through the territory of the Russian Federation.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shevyrina Tetiana Dmytrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 December 2, 2025
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited family trips to occupied Crimea after 2014 as integrity risk equivalent to visiting aggressor state territory
"The candidate and members of her family visited the territory of the aggressor state, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent necessity... the candidate's father visited temporarily occupied RF territories (AR Crimea) 11.04.2017–23.04.2017 and 01.07.2017–10.09.2017. Besides this, the candidate's father-in-law... during 2018–2021 the candidate's father-in-law made 8 more trips to RF territory and 2 trips to temporarily occupied Crimea: 22.08.2018–30.08.2018 and 21.07.2019-27.07.2019.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Khaidarova Inna Oleksiivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 November 23, 2025
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited judge's 249-day residence in post-annexation Crimea as primary basis for negative integrity finding.
"The judge was present on the territory of the RF-annexed Crimean peninsula for 249 days in the period 2014-2015. With high probability, the judge adhered to the occupying laws of the aggressor country, had security guarantees from the occupying authorities and used foreign currency as a means of payment on the territory of Ukraine. The judge's voluntary trip to occupied territory without urgent need and prolonged residence there only testify to the absence of a clear civic position of the judge regarding the occupation of part of Ukraine by the Russian Federation.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kravchenko Maksym Volodymyrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 November 11, 2025
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited post-occupation trips to Crimea and apartment ownership there as integrity violation basis.
"The candidate repeatedly crossed the administrative border after the occupation and accompanied his minor daughter to temporarily occupied Crimea and has an apartment there... The candidate crossed the administrative border with temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea at least three times through crossing point 601 (Chongar) between 04.06.2016-05.06.2016, 21.07.2016-23.07.2016, 07.08.2016-10.08.2016.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kateryna Anatoliivna Barabash: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 October 28, 2025
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC flagged judge's apartment ownership by sister living in Sevastopol and mother's trips to occupied Crimea as integrity concerns
"The judge's sister lives in the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine in Sevastopol and visited the controlled territory of Ukraine 4 times from 2017 to 2021. In the judge's questionnaire contained in the judicial file materials (p. 82), the Judge indicates that information about her sister's place of residence is unknown to her, although the Judge lives in an apartment that belongs to her sister
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Yatsun Oleksandr Serhiiovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 October 16, 2025
| 📍 Mariia Horban voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's family members' systematic visits to Russia and occupied Crimea as integrity violation.
"The candidate's father-in-law visited the territory of Crimea annexed by the Russian Federation during 17.06.2021–22.06.2021. In the conditions of ongoing armed aggression of the RF against Ukraine, the 'urgency of need' to visit the territory of the aggressor state or temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine in each specific case must be assessed considering the predicted risks and threats.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting