×
![]()
Oksana Mykhalevych
HIGH
Active
✓ Verified
⚠️ Violation Context
Recognition of Crimea as part of the Russian Federation violates fundamental principles of international law and Ukrainian sovereignty.
Ukrainian Law Violations:#
- Constitution of Ukraine, Article 2 — Territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.
- Constitution of Ukraine, Articles 73, 133–134 — Crimea is defined as an integral part of Ukraine.
- Law of Ukraine “On Ensuring the Rights and Freedoms of Citizens and the Legal Regime on the Temporarily Occupied Territory of Ukraine” — Establishes that Crimea remains Ukrainian territory under temporary occupation.
- Criminal Code of Ukraine, Article 110 — Criminalizes actions aimed at changing Ukraine’s territorial borders.
27
Documented Instances
2025 - 2026
Time Period
↓ View documented instances
👤 Biography & Current Position
Oksana Mykhalevych#
Member of the Public Integrity Council of Ukraine (fourth composition)
Oksana Mykhalevych (Михалевич Оксана Василівна) served as a member of the Public Integrity Council of Ukraine (fourth composition, August 15, 2025 – present), representing Media Initiative for Human Rights.
Why This Profile Exists#
The Public Integrity Council of Ukraine — the institution in which Oksana Mykhalevych served — systematically applied integrity criteria that treated connections to occupied Crimea as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation. This methodology rests on an unstated but consistent institutional premise: Crimea is under Russian jurisdiction.
Every PIC conclusion that cited a judge’s Crimea property, post-2014 travel to Crimea, or family ties on the peninsula as an integrity risk was, in effect, treating Crimea as a foreign (Russian) territory requiring justification before Ukrainian authorities — not as sovereign Ukrainian territory where Ukrainian citizens have every constitutional right to live, travel, and own property.
This directly contradicts:
- Ukraine’s Constitution, Articles 2, 73, 133–134 — Crimea is an integral part of Ukraine; its status can only be altered by an all-Ukrainian referendum
- The Law on the Temporarily Occupied Territory (2014) — explicitly maintains Ukrainian sovereignty over Crimea
- UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (2014) — affirms Ukraine’s territorial integrity and calls upon all states not to recognize any alteration of Crimea’s status
Oksana Mykhalevych, as a member of the PIC, participated in this institutional pattern of implicit recognition of Russian jurisdiction over Crimea.
International Law Violations#
- UN General Assembly Resolution 68/262 (March 27, 2014) — Affirms Ukraine’s territorial integrity and calls upon all states not to recognize any alteration in Crimea’s status.
- Budapest Memorandum on Security Assurances (1994) — Commits signatories to respect Ukraine’s borders and sovereignty.
- UN Charter Principles (Article 2(1) and 2(4)) — Prohibit acquisition of territory by force; establish sovereign equality of states.
Ukrainian Law Violations#
- Constitution of Ukraine, Article 2 — Territory of Ukraine is indivisible and inviolable.
- Constitution of Ukraine, Articles 73, 133–134 — Any change to Ukraine’s territory requires an all-Ukrainian referendum; Crimea is defined as an integral part of Ukraine.
- Criminal Code of Ukraine, Article 110 — Criminalizes actions aimed at changing Ukraine’s territorial borders in violation of the Constitution.
Role in the PIC’s Crimea-Recognition Pattern#
As a member of the Public Integrity Council’s fourth composition (2020-2023), Mykhalevych participated in institutional processes that operationally recognized Russian jurisdiction over Crimea by treating property, travel, or family connections to the peninsula as equivalent to connections with the Russian Federation in judicial integrity assessments. This institutional pattern directly contradicts Articles 2, 73, 133-134 of Ukraine’s Constitution and the Law on Temporarily Occupied Territory (2014), which affirm Crimea as Ukrainian sovereign territory.
Education and Career#
Oksana Mykhalevych is a Ukrainian lawyer specializing in representing victims in Maidan-related criminal cases and serving as a member of the Advisory Lawyers Group. Born in Kyiv in 1986, she has dedicated her career to seeking justice for those affected by the 2013-2014 Revolution of Dignity. As a member of Ukraine’s Public Integrity Council (4th composition), representing Media Initiative for Human Rights, her participation in PIC conclusions that treat Crimea-related connections as integrity risks constitutes an implicit institutional recognition of Russian jurisdiction over Crimea, contradicting Ukraine’s constitutional order.
Controversies and Criticism#
Participation in Crimea-recognition methodology. As a member of the Public Integrity Council, Oksana Mykhalevych participated in the application of integrity assessment methodology that implicitly treats Crimea as operating under Russian jurisdiction. Every PIC conclusion that penalized judges for Crimea-related connections — property, travel, family ties — reproduces this premise in an official state-adjacent procedure.
Constitutional contradiction. The methodology applied by the PIC in which Oksana Mykhalevych served operates on a factual premise — that Crimea is under Russian administrative control — that Ukraine’s legal system requires treating as an illegal occupation rather than an established institutional reality.
Summary#
Oksana Mykhalevych’s membership in the Public Integrity Council’s fourth composition (August 15, 2025 – present) placed them inside the body responsible for applying integrity indicators that penalize judges and candidates for post-2014 connections to Crimea, on the operating premise that such connections carry the same weight as connections to the Russian Federation itself.
This site currently catalogues 27 PIC conclusions involving Oksana Mykhalevych, citing a Crimea-related connection — running from the earliest, on Kravchenko Maksym Volodymyrovych (September 26, 2025), to the most recent, on Podzirov Andrii Olehovych: PIC Treats 13-Day Crimea Trip for Son's Dance Festival as Integrity Violation Requiring 'Urgent Necessity' Justification (September 30, 2026). Each is documented separately below, with its underlying document and vote record.
ℹ️ What Else We Know
Professional Activities#
- Member of Advisory Lawyers Group representing Maidan victims
- Represented victims in high-profile cases including former Berkut commander Oleh Boyko
- Served on PIC 4th composition representing Media Initiative for Human Rights
- Father is a lecturer at a Kyiv computer technologies and economics college
- Advocates for 8-year sentences for Berkut officers involved in Maidan violence
📅 Career Timeline
2020 - 2023
Member of Public Integrity Council (4th composition)
Ukraine's High Qualification Commission of Judges — Kyiv, Ukraine
Ukraine's High Qualification Commission of Judges — Kyiv, Ukraine
2014 - ongoing
Representative of victims in Maidan cases
Advisory Lawyers Group — Kyiv, Ukraine
Advisory Lawyers Group — Kyiv, Ukraine
🖼️ Photo & Document Gallery
Oksana Mykhalevych
×
![]()
📋 Documented Instances
Podzirov Andrii Olehovych: PIC Treats 13-Day Crimea Trip for Son's Dance Festival as Integrity Violation Requiring 'Urgent Necessity' Justification
📅 September 30, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC adopted negative integrity conclusion on judge Podzirov citing visits to temporarily occupied territories without urgent necessity (including a 13-day June–July 2014 Crimea trip) and concerns about free use of an apartment.
"The candidate together with his family visited the territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea more than four months after the start of the temporary occupation by the Russian Federation. At the same time, according to sub-paragraph 1.5 of paragraph 1 of the Indicators... trips to the Russian Federation, the Autonomous Republic of Crimea or other temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine out of urgent necessity to close relatives or to resolve property matters do not in themselves indicate a violation of the relevant indicator. In this case, the candidate explained the trip to the temporarily occupied Crimea by the need to ensure his son's participation in a dance festival. That is, the stated purpose of the trip was not related to the need to visit close relatives, or to resolve property matters.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Blyzniuk Ihor Volodymyrovych: PIC Cites Cohabitant's Parents' Trips to Occupied Crimea as Grounds for Deliberate Concealment Finding
📅 September 18, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC adopted negative conclusion on Court of Appeal candidate Blyzniuk, citing cohabitant's parents' Crimea trips as deliberately concealed.
"The mother of the person cohabiting with the candidate visited the temporarily occupied Crimea: she left on 19.07.2019 through the temporary checkpoint at the administrative border of Ukraine at Kalanchak and returned to the controlled territory on 30.07.2019 through the same checkpoint. The father of the person cohabiting with the candidate visited the temporarily occupied Crimea twice… The candidate answered: '…I am not aware of such trips by members of my family or close persons.' Thus, the candidate, deliberately, with the aim of concealing information about… the temporarily occupied territory… provided knowingly false information.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Yushkov Mykhailo Mykhailovych: Repeated Trips to Occupied Crimea (2018–2020) and Mother-in-Law's Russian Passport Cited as Integrity Grounds
📅 August 31, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC approved a negative integrity conclusion on appellate court candidate Yushkov, citing his 2018–2020 trips to occupied Crimea and his mother-in-law's Russian passport.
"The candidate for the position of judge visited the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent necessity — that is, in the absence of critical and/or urgent, vitally necessary circumstances that cannot be resolved in any other way than by personal presence in those territories — despite the threat to his own security, that of his close persons, and to Ukraine's national security. [...] According to information obtained from open sources, including data arrays containing information from Russian registries, it has been established that the candidate's mother-in-law holds a passport of a citizen of the Russian Federation (series, number, issued by the UFMS in Kaliningrad Oblast of the RF in 2014). This information is important in the context of evaluating the candidate, also taking into account the facts of his repeated visits to the temporarily occupied territory of Ukraine and the likely ties of his mother-in-law to the aggressor state.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Bikezina Olena Vasylivna: PIC Cites July 2014 Travel from Occupied Donetsk to Occupied Sevastopol and Family Crossings as Integrity Concerns
📅 August 28, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC issued negative conclusion on appellate judge candidate Bikezina, citing her 2014 travel to occupied Sevastopol and family crossings into occupied territories.
"The Public Integrity Council draws attention to the fact that the Candidate, who intended to become a judge and took the oath on 31.03.2015, on 02.07.2014, after the occupation by the Russian Federation of Donetsk and the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, traveled from the TOT of Donetsk to the TOT of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea in the city of Sevastopol and remained there until 10.08.2014. Visits by representatives of judicial bodies and members of their families to occupied territories and the aggressor state without urgent need are perceived negatively by society and may damage the authority of the judiciary as a whole.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Lapchenko Oksana Mykolaivna: PIC Issues Negative Integrity Conclusion Citing Conflict of Interest and Unexplained Asset Origins; Husband's Crimea Visits and Occupied-Territory Ties Noted as Additional Concerns
📅 July 29, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC adopted a negative integrity conclusion based on conflict-of-interest findings and unexplained asset origins; the husband's two trips to occupied Crimea and family-owned property there were recorded as additional concerns requiring explanation.
"The candidate's husband Lapchenko P.P. twice visited the temporarily occupied Crimea during the periods 12.08.2018–21.08.2018 and 16.08.2021–26.08.2021. [...] My husband's mother is the owner of a residential house located at: Autonomous Republic of Crimea, Chornomorskyi district, village Medvedeve [...] The cited information regarding systematic trips by close relatives and the candidate's husband himself to the temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine, as well as information about their use of passports of the russian federation and documents issued by the illegal occupying bodies [...] raises reasonable doubts in an outside observer regarding the existence and nature of the connections of the candidate's husband's close relatives with the aggressor state.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Fomin Pavlo Viktorovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 June 9, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's and his mother's trips to occupied Crimea in 2018–2019 as creating Russian intelligence recruitment risk.
"The candidate and members of his family visited the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea in 2018 and 2019. […] Having weighed and assessed all the facts and circumstances, the Public Integrity Council considers that, despite the absence of a direct prohibition on visits during the period between 2014 and 2021, such trips without urgent necessity, firstly, created risks to the candidate's independence and exposed him to the risk of falling under the influence of the aggressor state's special services, and secondly, demonstrated a dismissive attitude on the part of the candidate's family toward the civic consensus on publicly condemning Russia's aggressive actions and observing the unspoken principle of refraining from travel to the territory of the aggressor state.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Fedorova Olena Viktorivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 June 7, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC flagged family trips to occupied Crimea in 2014–2015 via Moscow–Simferopol train as insufficiently justified integrity risk.
"In the opinion of the Public Integrity Council, the explanations provided by the Candidate regarding her visits in 2014–2015 to the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea are not sufficiently convincing and are not confirmed by proper and admissible evidence. In particular, the Candidate justifies the necessity of the trips by family circumstances — the need to assist her husband's elderly relative due to a deterioration in his health. However, no documentary evidence has been provided to demonstrate the severity of that person's health condition, the necessity of the Candidate's and her family members' personal presence, or the impossibility of providing such assistance in another way (in particular, through other relatives or remotely).
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Radchenko Vitalii Yevhenovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 June 3, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC flagged candidate's sister crossing Crimea administrative boundary checkpoints and obtaining a Russian passport as integrity concerns.
"The candidate's sister crossed through KPVV [name] (at the time — a crossing point on the line of demarcation in Donetsk oblast) between 09.01.2018 and 25.05.2018. On 29.05.2018 the candidate's sister crossed through KPVV [name] (a temporary crossing point on the administrative boundary of Ukraine bordering Crimea annexed by Russia), and returned on 25.07.2018 through KPVV [name] (a temporary crossing point on the administrative boundary of Ukraine established shortly after Russia's forcible annexation of Crimea in 2014).
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Gida Olga Serhiivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 May 31, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited judge's September 2017 trip to Crimea with minor child and partner's property in occupied territory as integrity violations
"The judge did not display civic consciousness and patriotism, and committed acts that indicate support for aggressive actions of other states against Ukraine. The judge visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need, i.e., in the absence of critical and/or urgent vital circumstances
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shalahinova Anastasiia Volodymyrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 May 27, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited systematic trips to occupied Crimea and appeals to occupying courts as primary grounds for negative integrity finding
"The candidate visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need... despite threats to her own security, close persons and national security of Ukraine and appealed to judicial institutions of the occupying authority... The candidate made at least 6 entries to temporarily occupied territory, namely: 19.07.2014 - Exit 605 - 02.09.2014 - Entry 604
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Solovyov Oleg Leonidovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 April 14, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited repeated family trips to occupied Crimea from 2014-2018 as primary basis for negative integrity conclusion
"The candidate and his family members visited temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need, i.e., in the absence of critical and/or urgent life-essential circumstances. At the same time, such trips could not but be accompanied by contacts with representatives of the RF occupation forces, in particular RF border guards and customs officers. It is not excluded that also with representatives of the RF FSB. In addition, during such trips it was very difficult to avoid payment of money by the candidate and members of his family to the occupation budget.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Korytska Viktoriia Oleksandrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 April 14, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited judge's two post-occupation trips to Crimea and interactions with Russian border guards as primary basis for negative integrity conclusion
"undoubtedly when crossing the administrative border of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea, the judge communicated with Russian 'border guards' and 'customs officers', followed their orders and demands, provided documents for verification confirming her identity and right of entry to Crimea, as well as her belongings for customs inspection and processing
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Radchenko Vitalii Yevhenovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 30, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC flagged family ties to occupied Crimea including medical treatment in Alushta and Russian passport acquisition as integrity concerns.
"The candidate's mother left through the Kalanchak checkpoint - there is no information about her return. The candidate's sister left through the Chonhar checkpoint (temporary crossing point through Ukraine's administrative border with Crimea annexed by Russia), and returned through the Kalanchak checkpoint. According to available information, a woman with the same name as the candidate's sister received a Russian passport. The candidate's wife's mother underwent medical examination in occupied Alushta.
"
MEDIUM
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Maksym Mykolaiovych Hloba: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 30, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited Hloba's multiple trips to Russian Federation during 2013-2014 period as unjustified travel violating integrity standards
"During the period from 25.12.2013 to 13.06.2014, the Candidate repeatedly visited RF territory. The Public Integrity Council critically evaluates the provided explanations, as the Candidate's stated motives for visiting RF territory do not indicate the presence of objective or urgent necessity for such trips and are of a domestic nature.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shofarenko Yurii Fedorovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 March 26, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited undisclosed apartment sale in occupied Simferopol as integrity violation
"The candidate in his asset declaration for 2015 declared income of 2,304,000 UAH received from the disposal of real estate located in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The sale of real estate located in the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea after the beginning of its occupation, in the absence of information about applicable legislation and procedure for formalizing such a transaction, may indicate a risk of carrying out relevant actions within the legal framework of the occupying state or with the participation of persons connected to the occupation authorities.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Samoilenko Olena Anatoliivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 January 31, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's parents residing in occupied Donetsk and family travel patterns as primary integrity risks.
"The candidate's close relatives permanently reside under occupation from the very beginning in 2014 of the Russian Federation's military aggression against Ukraine to the present time. In the conditions of ongoing armed aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, the "urgency of need" to reside in temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine in each specific case must be evaluated considering the predicted risks and threats primarily to the life and health of the person (judge/candidate) and their close relatives, as well as to state security and national interests of Ukraine in case of detention of such person, their recruitment, etc.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Medvediev Kostiantyn Viktorovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 January 31, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's loan guarantee based on future Crimean property inheritance as integrity risk due to occupation-related legal uncertainties.
"Thus, the Candidate effectively admitted that the source for repaying the multi-million loan in the future should be property that was not inherited by him at the time of receiving the funds, was not in his ownership, and regarding which there are significant legal and factual uncertainties related to the temporary occupation of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kolomiiets Nataliia Oleksiivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 January 28, 2026
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC flagged candidate's in-laws' post-2022 trips to occupied Crimea and their apartment ownership in Simferopol as integrity risks.
"Such trips without urgent necessity, firstly, created risks for the candidate's independence and exposed her to the risk of falling under the influence of the aggressor country's special services, and secondly, demonstrated a dismissive attitude from the candidate's family toward the civic consensus regarding public condemnation of RF's aggressive actions and adherence to the unspoken principle of refraining from trips to the aggressor country's territory.
"
LOW
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shabratskyy Hryhoriy Oleksiyovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 December 31, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited post-occupation trips to Luhansk via Russia and family ties on occupied territory as integrity risks from Russian intelligence services.
"The candidate and members of his family visited the territory of the aggressor state, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent need, i.e. in the absence of critical and/or urgent vital circumstances... According to the integrity declaration for 2022 submitted with the competition documents, the candidate and his wife repeatedly visited temporarily occupied Luhansk in 2015 and 2016 through the territory of the Russian Federation.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kuznetsov Roman Oleksandrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 December 29, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited three post-occupation trips to Crimea and family ties to occupied Sevastopol as basis for negative integrity finding.
"The Candidate crossed the administrative border with the temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea at least three times after the start of occupation: KPVV 'Kalanchak': 12.08.2018 (exit) – 20.08.2018 (entry); KPVV 'Chaplynka': 24.10.2019 (exit) – 26.10.2019 (entry); KPVV 'Kalanchak': 19.08.2021 (exit) – 26.08.2021 (entry).
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shevyrina Tetiana Dmytrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 December 2, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited family trips to occupied Crimea after 2014 as integrity risk equivalent to visiting aggressor state territory
"The candidate and members of her family visited the territory of the aggressor state, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent necessity... the candidate's father visited temporarily occupied RF territories (AR Crimea) 11.04.2017–23.04.2017 and 01.07.2017–10.09.2017. Besides this, the candidate's father-in-law... during 2018–2021 the candidate's father-in-law made 8 more trips to RF territory and 2 trips to temporarily occupied Crimea: 22.08.2018–30.08.2018 and 21.07.2019-27.07.2019.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Khaidarova Inna Oleksiivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 November 23, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited judge's 249-day residence in post-annexation Crimea as primary basis for negative integrity finding.
"The judge was present on the territory of the RF-annexed Crimean peninsula for 249 days in the period 2014-2015. With high probability, the judge adhered to the occupying laws of the aggressor country, had security guarantees from the occupying authorities and used foreign currency as a means of payment on the territory of Ukraine. The judge's voluntary trip to occupied territory without urgent need and prolonged residence there only testify to the absence of a clear civic position of the judge regarding the occupation of part of Ukraine by the Russian Federation.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kravchenko Maksym Volodymyrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 November 11, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited post-occupation trips to Crimea and apartment ownership there as integrity violation basis.
"The candidate repeatedly crossed the administrative border after the occupation and accompanied his minor daughter to temporarily occupied Crimea and has an apartment there... The candidate crossed the administrative border with temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea at least three times through crossing point 601 (Chongar) between 04.06.2016-05.06.2016, 21.07.2016-23.07.2016, 07.08.2016-10.08.2016.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Rudenko Viktoriia Vasylivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 October 24, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited husband's undeclared farm in occupied Crimea as integrity violation
"Moreover, according to the Opendatabot database, he is the founder of the 'Sosman' farm, which conducts activities in the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea... The totality of the stated facts — non-declaration of the actual husband in 2009-2021, his trips to the aggressor country in 2014-2015 and possible involvement in entrepreneurial activities in the occupied territory of Crimea — the PIC considers as evidence of the candidate's non-compliance with integrity criteria and professional ethics of a judge
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Yatsun Oleksandr Serhiiovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 October 16, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited candidate's family members' systematic visits to Russia and occupied Crimea as integrity violation.
"The candidate's father-in-law visited the territory of Crimea annexed by the Russian Federation during 17.06.2021–22.06.2021. In the conditions of ongoing armed aggression of the RF against Ukraine, the 'urgency of need' to visit the territory of the aggressor state or temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine in each specific case must be assessed considering the predicted risks and threats.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Mashkina Natalia Vasylivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 October 6, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited 51 post-annexation trips to occupied territories as integrity risk creating judicial independence concerns.
"According to information available in the judge's file, she together with her son after the annexation of Crimea and occupation of part of Donbas traveled to temporarily occupied territories: during 2015 - 14 times, during 2016 - 23 times, during 2017 - 14 times. Also the judge repeatedly crossed the state border with temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine as a driver.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting
Negative Integrity Conclusion on Kravchenko Maksym Volodymyrovych: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
📅 September 26, 2025
| 📍 Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor: PIC cited three trips to occupied Crimea in 2016 and undisclosed apartment in Partenit as primary integrity violations.
"State Border Guard Service data shows that the candidate crossed the administrative border with temporarily occupied Autonomous Republic of Crimea through checkpoint 601 (Chongar) at least three times during 04.06.2016-05.06.2016, 21.07.2016-23.07.2016, 07.08.2016-10.08.2016. The 2015 declaration did not specify the value of an apartment in Partenit (Autonomous Republic of Crimea) owned by my son.
"
HIGH
✓ Verified
Official meeting