Negative Integrity Conclusion on Shevyrina Tetiana Dmytrivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment
🎯 Position at Time of Violation
Position: Member of the Public Integrity Council
Organization: Public Integrity Council of Ukraine
💬 The Statement
Context: This quote demonstrates how the PIC treats visits to Crimea as equivalent to visits to 'RF territory' and 'aggressor state territory,' thereby implicitly recognizing Russian jurisdiction over Ukrainian Crimea.
📄 Full Details
What Happened#
On December 2, 2025, the Public Integrity Council approved a negative integrity conclusion on Shevyrina Tetiana Dmytrivna (Шевиріна Тетяна Дмитрівна), a candidate for a position at Ochakivsky City District Court of Mykolaiv Oblast. The conclusion was adopted by 12 of 19 members, including Oksana Mykhalevych.
The PIC cited multiple trips by the candidate and her family members to occupied Crimea after 2014 without urgent necessity as an integrity risk. By treating these visits to Ukrainian sovereign territory as equivalent to visits to the aggressor state Russia and flagging them as security concerns, the PIC operationally recognizes Russian jurisdiction over Crimea.
Oksana Mykhalevych voted in favor of this conclusion. The Crimea-related element was cited as a direct basis for the negative finding.
The Crimea Connection#
The candidate and members of her family visited the territory of the aggressor state, temporarily occupied territories of Ukraine without urgent necessity… the candidate’s father visited temporarily occupied RF territories (AR Crimea) 11.04.2017–23.04.2017 and 01.07.2017–10.09.2017. Besides this, the candidate’s father-in-law… during 2018–2021 the candidate’s father-in-law made 8 more trips to RF territory and 2 trips to temporarily occupied Crimea: 22.08.2018–30.08.2018 and 21.07.2019-27.07.2019.
This quote demonstrates how the PIC treats visits to Crimea as equivalent to visits to ‘‘RF territory’’ and ‘‘aggressor state territory,’’ thereby implicitly recognizing Russian jurisdiction over Ukrainian Crimea.
Context#
The Public Integrity Council was established in 2016 as part of post-2014 judicial reform in Ukraine. Its mandate was to assist in vetting judges and judicial candidates based on integrity and professional ethics.
By treating Crimea-related connections as integrity risks within a formal assessment framework, the PIC applies an operational logic that treats Crimea as Russian-administered territory — contradicting Ukraine’s constitutional position that Crimea is sovereign Ukrainian territory under temporary occupation.
This conclusion is part of a documented pattern: a systematic review of PIC conclusions reveals that across dozens of cases, judges and candidates were assessed negatively on the basis of connections to Crimea. The pattern was formally codified in the December 16, 2020 revised Indicators.
Verification#
- Official PIC conclusion document dated December 2, 2025.
- Electronic voting record confirming participation by Oksana Mykhalevych (12 of 19).
🔎 Evidence
- Official Public Integrity Council conclusion on Shevyrina Tetiana Dmytrivna (Шевиріна Тетяна Дмитрівна), dated December 2, 2025. document
- Electronic voting record appended to the conclusion, confirming the vote (12 of 19). document
- Archived copy of Official Public Integrity Council conclusion on Shevyrina Tetiana Dmytrivna (Шевиріна Тетяна Дмитрівна), dated December 2, 2025. archive