Negative Integrity Conclusion on Remezok Anastasiia Yuriivna: Crimea Connection in Judicial Assessment

What Happened#

On August 21, 2024, the Public Integrity Council approved a negative integrity conclusion on Remezok Anastasiia Yuriivna (Ремезок Анастасія Юріївна), a candidate for a position at Oleksandriiskyi City District Court of Kirovohrad Oblast. The conclusion was adopted by 13 of 20 members, including Tetiana Kurmanova.

The PIC flagged Judge Remezok’s August 2014 trip to occupied Crimea with her son as an integrity risk, treating the post-occupation visit as creating risks to judicial independence and potential exposure to aggressor state intelligence services. By characterizing travel to Crimea as equivalent to visiting the ‘aggressor state territory,’ the PIC effectively recognizes Russian jurisdiction over the peninsula.

Tetiana Kurmanova voted in favor of this conclusion. The Crimea-related element was flagged as a concern but was not cited as the primary basis for the negative conclusion.

The Crimea Connection#

In August 2014, the judge together with her son visited the temporarily occupied territory of the Autonomous Republic of Crimea. The PIC believes that despite the absence of direct prohibition on visiting the Russian Federation between 2014 and 2021, such trips without urgent necessity, first, created risks to the judge’s independence and exposed her to the risk of coming under the influence of the aggressor state’s intelligence services.

This quote demonstrates the PIC’’s implicit recognition of Russian jurisdiction by treating Crimea as equivalent to ‘‘aggressor state territory’’ subject to the same integrity risks as Russia proper.

Context#

The Public Integrity Council was established in 2016 as part of post-2014 judicial reform in Ukraine. Its mandate was to assist in vetting judges and judicial candidates based on integrity and professional ethics.

By treating Crimea-related connections as integrity risks within a formal assessment framework, the PIC applies an operational logic that treats Crimea as Russian-administered territory — contradicting Ukraine’s constitutional position that Crimea is sovereign Ukrainian territory under temporary occupation.

This conclusion is part of a documented pattern: a systematic review of PIC conclusions reveals that across dozens of cases, judges and candidates were assessed negatively on the basis of connections to Crimea. The pattern was formally codified in the December 16, 2020 revised Indicators.

Verification#

• Official PIC conclusion document dated August 21, 2024.
• Electronic voting record confirming participation by Tetiana Kurmanova (13 of 20).